My #OpenEdSpace

This week is Open Education Week, myself and some JISC colleagues have spent some time thinking about what that means to us in our practice and more generally. Amber Thomas and David Kernohan have also created diagrams of what there open education space looks like, and building on their ideas and some of my colleagues from the across the net I’ve had a go at explaining my own #openedspace

In the ‘open’ model below, an ecosystem exists where learning providers, accreditation bodies and, for example, professional associations exist within an ecosystem with the learners and people who can support learners and appropriate tools, such as open resources and the ability to make payments (either real, or in kind)  if appropriate.

The ecosystem, under the right conditions, enables learning opportunities to flourish using all or some of the constituent parts, where learning can be accredited or non accredited, formal or informal, free or paid, and a variety of other options. The important part is that the ecosystem is open and transparent. The openness allows broad and diverse access, which leads to greater resource. The transparency is important so that the connections and diversity of leaning opportunity can be seen by all and either replicated or modified.

Click to enlarge

Acknowledgements to:

6 thoughts on “My #OpenEdSpace

  1. This looks as if it is a self-organising organic system – how would you fit the idea of the planned curriculum in to this model? Or are you seeing a variable granularity to your “learning opportunities”.

    It’s a great model, loads of stuff to tease out.

  2. Looks a bit like Illich’s Four Networks, though more explicitly a marketplace (cf Christopher Alexander).

    I can see how some parts of the network are almost in place – standards for the “products” (learning opportunities and learning resources).

    However, in any market the key components are the standards for exchange; payment is in there already, but for formal education we also have qualifications and credit backed by the reputations of institutions. In an open ed space, the credit exchange mechanism has to be opened out (I’m not sure how well badges can really handle this)

    (David is right that this is a self-organising system, however I think the regulators in this model are the exchange systems. Without these you’d need some sort of brokerage authority that rationed services and providers in a supply-side fashion… rather like HEFCE.)

Mentions

  • A reflection for open education week | Phil's work blog
  • openedspace « fragments of amber
  • Open Education: The Fifth Network | Scott's Workblog
  • UKOER in Open Education Week | Open Education Week

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *