Thinking about what needs to happen next.

I’m currently working on a piece about digital leadership in learning and teaching, as part of a wider series. I’ve been thinking about the digital word salad that we have all become more familiar with because of this past year; flexible, blended, online, synchronous, asynchronous, hybrid, hyflex. And the models! How many models have we seen developed or adapted. It feels that we have spent a lot of energy trying to define and describe what is happening. I sometimes wonder how many of these models and descriptions are illusory… I have talked about edtech unicorns in the past, but of course those unicorns are not just technologies, they might also be the ideas we surround digital with. (Maybe I should do something on Edtech Unicorns for my inaugural at Keele?) 

The piece I am working on at the moment asks me to consider digital leadership and strategy Post-Covid. I’ve spent a few days thinking about that. And I came up with a list of things that I think need to be said: 

  • Back in March, it wasn’t a pivot, it was an emergency, and some coped better than others, but I didn’t hear about any complete failures when it came to students having access to learning? 
  • The institutions that coped well had leadership teams that both understood what digital could do, and understood that solutions had to involve lecturers, support staff and students. It wasn’t just a single individual, or even a single team, it was wider than that. 
  • Technology was key, but pedagogical practices is what got students through the year. (A good example was the flexible approaches to assessment, not the implementation of “digital proctoring”) 
  • But the most important thing I want to think about is “there is no post-Covid” or at least, we need to prepare as if Covid will be with us on and off for several years. 

So what needs to be captured, what worked, what needs to be in place, what does a digital education strategy look like that is flexible and able to cope with being physically present, or online? Maybe it’s as simple as Scott Robison at Portland State University says?

“All courses are online courses; it’s just a matter of how often you meet face to face” 

I’d welcome other people’s thoughts. What do we need to keep? What needs to change? Above all, I think we need to be careful what unicorns we chase! 

    Mentions

  • 💬 I would use this - its the point we realised that focusing on the individual was creating problems, and where we started using tension pairs more organisationally and at different points - such as for courses (with @DonnaLanclos @jamesclay & @cbthomso
  • 💬 all continuums set up false dichotomies. As if people are one thing or another. In our staff dev sessions we stopped using "tension pairs" when thinking of individual practice because of the way it influences thinking. lawriephipps.co.uk/9290/
  • 💬 I wrote something similar back in 2016 elearningstuff.net/2016/01/14/map…
  • 💬 Deborah Arnold
  • 💬 Exactly ...
  • 💬 brid.gy
  • 💬 It should always be symbiotic ! Technology 'can' be for good ,for driving change, for challenging pedagogic models and our assumptions of the 'known' of the 'possible' and the 'impossible' !
  • 💬 brid.gy
  • 💬 Thanks James - I'll take a look
  • 💬 Mark Childs
  • 💬 Marcus Elliott
  • 💬 David White
  • 💬 This looks fine as it is. Is it published anywhere so I can reference?
  • 💬 Turning adjectives into nouns, and nouns into verbs seems to be the starting point of many of these discussions - "grasping for the soundbyte" will be the subtitle of my book about working with educational technologists
  • 💬 When Donna and I covered tension pairs on the #JiscDigLead (based on @davecormier's ideas) we suggested that you can look at a course (not people) and map activities - swapping the pairs for what you want to see. To see if you have a good range of activi
  • 💬 And then I was thinking there is 'facilitated - synchronous' and 'facilitated - asynchronous'. Maybe that's my triangle? :-)
  • 💬 Yep - I've long argued that remote or in-person is the same distinction pedagogically as deciding whether to stand by the door or the window. It's an obsession with location over what you're actually doing.
  • 💬 I was thinking along the 'independent vs facilitated' lines a few years ago as it reflects what students are interested in more than focusing on 'location'.
  • 💬 Noted
  • 💬 Agreed, and in one tweet you demonstrate that we have plenty of language already to describe all the things that are happening - seriously my junk folder is full of emails from vendors, and others, inventing new words or adding suffixes and prefixes
  • 💬 I was pondering this yesterday while using the @ABC_LD method for planning. Struggled with the face-to-face V online activities graph as it’s all online. The best I came up with was ‘independent v facilitated’. Thoughts / pointers welcome!
  • 💬 "“All courses are online courses; it’s just a matter of how often you meet face to face” to be clear is something that @OtterScotter said and I cited rather than taking credit
  • 💬 The starting point should be what's the most effective design? What are the things the students have to do to achieve the learning outcomes? They could be on-campus, remote, online or offline, tutor-led or independent, sync or async, whatever, but choosi
  • 💬 All courses are online courses is a helpful starting point. Flipping the thinking but not defining the ratios. A course could have an online design but spend the majority of the time in-buildings.
  • 💬 checking
  • 💬 openbookpublishers.com/htmlreader/978… editing the link now
  • 💬 Thanks - the link to your book chapter is broken - is it still available?
  • 💬 Thanks Lawrie!
  • 💬 Thinking about what needs to happen next. lawriephipps.co.uk/thinking-about…
  • 💬 Thinking about, workshops, presentations and papers I'm doing in January and February; what does a digital strategy look like in education t
  • 💬 JamesRoy SFHEA
  • 💬 Nonhlanhla Vilakati Nsibande
  • 💬 Andy Doyle
  • 💬 This year has been a rollercoaster, perfectly illustrated by the development of Teams educationblog.microsoft.com/en-us/2020/12/…
  • 💬 knowledge FM
  • 💬 API Trends
  • 💬 The Martech Summit
  • 💬 Thinking about, workshops, presentations and papers I'm doing in January and February; what does a digital strategy look like in education t
  • 💬 Dr Amanda M L Taylor (-Beswick) #EdTech50
  • 💬 Thinking about, workshops, presentations and papers I'm doing in January and February; what does a digital strategy look like in education t
  • 💬 Tom Farrelly
  • 💬 Just thinking about what needs to happen next. lawriephipps.co.uk/thinking-about…
  • 💬 Chris Rowell
  • 💬 Just thinking about what needs to happen next. lawriephipps.co.uk/thinking-about…
  • 💬 James Clay
  • 💬 Prof. Elizabeth Cleaver
  • 💬 I like this a lot Lawrie it’s very thought-provoking. Yes do mention the unicorns in your Keele inaugural. And you are right there is no such thing as post covid. As @kay_sambell and I say about Assessment: we can never go back to the old days
  • 💬 Dr. Laura Gibbs
  • 💬 Just thinking about what needs to happen next. lawriephipps.co.uk/thinking-about…
  • 💬 Just thinking about what needs to happen next. lawriephipps.co.uk/thinking-about…
  • 💬 Graham Hibbert
  • 💬 margy maclibrary
  • 💬 Just thinking about what needs to happen next. lawriephipps.co.uk/thinking-about…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.